Ozzie Scribbler's corner

godtie:

How to get me to unfollow you immediately:

image

gearstation:

swellowman:

givemeinternet:

Was this a joke or is someone getting fired?



SCREAMS

gearstation:

swellowman:

givemeinternet:

Was this a joke or is someone getting fired?

SCREAMS

ladugard:

The only nail polish for me

ladugard:

The only nail polish for me

unpretty:

say what you will about fangirls but when someone says ‘fangirling’ i think of excitement and unbridled glee and undignified noises of delight but when someone says ‘fanboying’ i think of impotent rage and insecurity and disproportionate aggression

invisiblelad:

iwriteaboutfeminism:

You have a Town Hall on police brutality and THIS is what you do with it?! Part 3.

[part 1] [part 2

And they’re checking license plates of the people simply attending the town hall meeting? Merely living there seems like a continual erosion of civil liberties at this point. 

nihileigh:

When we live in a world where you can access free content of naked consenting women in less than 5 seconds, why are people still invading the privacy of non-consenting women for nudes?

Hint: It has something to do with people feeling entitled to making any woman their personal porn, even if it violates or humiliates her in the process.

justherefordaart:

mystic-sybil:

bikiniarmorbattledamage:

Black Desert's iconic ranger they use in their promotional has an outfit so absurd that we can't even bingo it.

Wearing the chainmail as underwear, a steel boobplate bra that can’t be put on or removed without welding equipment… it is truly a baffling selection of nonsensical design choices.  Strangely the male characters seem to have much more sensible attire.

- wincenworks 

Looking at the first pic like : oh she’s kinda cu—WHY NO PANTS

This is more practical than it’s being given credit for.
The boobplate at least covers her heart and part of her lungs, but it really should extend downward a bit more.
The right arms fancy swirls of metal are better than bare skin, and the shoulder piece has historical precedence for saving lives.
Additionally, we can’t see the sides and back of the boobplate in the picture, so it could very well have leather sections for donning/removing.
Also: Archers specifically tend to have problems with helmets. Can’t have your vision obscured and fire at an ally.
The worst part of this is the lack of pants, and even that can be weakly justified as need for mobility, but a pair of leather tights would have been better.

All in all, not as bad as it could have been.

Also, I don’t see examples of Cleavage or Bared Back.

Uh, are we looking at the same image? Virtually everything you claim here is incorrect. That’s kinda impressive, really.

The boobplate at least covers her heart and part of her lungs

How exactly? All I see it cover for sure are the boobs. And that won’t work much either, cause there’s no way to prevent this thing from slipping off.
The heart is screwed from the get-go, not only because the boobplate’s crease creates a weak point right above it, but also because there’s that tiny superfluous hole in the middle that weakens the thing even more.

The right arms fancy swirls of metal are better than bare skin

You’re literally saying that a random piece of metal around your arm that can jam into your skin any moment is BETTER than zero metal, cause it provides… protection?

it could very well have leather sections for donning/removing

Idle speculation. Nuff said.

Archers specifically tend to have problems with helmets. Can’t have your vision obscured and fire at an ally.

Helmets that don’t obscure vision are a thing since the ancient times. It can be designed so that most of her face isn’t covered, but still provides protection for the cranium. Cause, you know, head is not all covered in eyes.

The worst part of this is the lack of pants, and even that can be weakly justified as need for mobility, but a pair of leather tights would have been better.

You just debunked your own weak justification. No, short skirt does not increase mobility better than pants. Especially since the skirt in question seems like chainmail brushing against the wearer’s skin.

I don’t see examples of Cleavage or Bared Back.

The clevage means “a sharp division; a split.”, so technically every boobplate counts for having one by the virtue of that crease I talked about before.
And the areas directly above and below that boobplate are not her back, you say?

All in all, not as bad as it could have been.

All in all, almost everything you wrote are really, really poor excuses for a design that is very much impossible, impractical and unjustifiable.

TL; DR: You’re giving this… thing waaay too much credit.

Ozzie out, piece.

badassqueerbabe:

thequantumqueer:

prongsmydeer:

Harry Potter AU where someone sees Harry in his cousin’s over-sized clothing with his underfed body and hears him casually mention the cupboard in which he sleeps and calls the fucking police

tbh id rather have Harry Potter canon where Dumbledore obliviates Harry’s social worker and its textualized how horrible a person Dumbledore is

You know that makes sense, that Dumbledore would step in and prevent anyone from removing Harry from that house.

Think about it, Dumbledore needed Harry to be easy to manipulate.  He needed Harry to not know what genuine caring and love look like, so that he would be desperate for any love and caring he could get, that way Dumbledore could pretend to love and care for Harry while really using him.

I wouldn’t go so far to say that Dumbledore didn’t care for Harry whatsoever. He did, but in his very disturbing, broken way.
Which makes sense, cause Dumbledore’s life was made of disturbing and/or broken relationships. He dated a sociopath, was guilty of his sister’s death and grew distant from his brother. Then he never fully healed from any of those emotional scars or forgave himself. No wonder the guy turned out to be such a shitty father figure.

Was Dumbledore shamelessly manipulating Harry? Most certainly! Does it mean he did not care for the boy? Nah. To me he was just subconsciously perpetuating the trauma and abuse that formed him in his early life.

fandomsandfeminism:

everythingsbetterwithbisexuals:

stardust-rain:

killerkhaleesi:

amorphinetoast:

amuseoffyre:

claudiaboleyn:

burntlikethesun:

loremipsumfandom:

fauxkaren:

quantumblog:

trying-to-resonate-concrete:

Dear STFU-Moffat and associates,

From now on, I insist you describe Steven Moffat as “Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat.” Just to make sure you’re being fair.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat is a queerbaiting hack

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat’s writing features sexism and overly complicated plots that don’t really make any sense.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat has characters needlessly tell the viewer information that he should be showing them.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat is incapable of creating real emotional stakes in his stories.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat calls teenage mother a ‘slut’ in DVD commentary

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat says bisexuals are too busy having sex to watch television, and therefore don’t need representing.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat thinks asexuals are too boring to write about. 

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat thinks that rather than having a female Doctor, it’s about time a man played the Queen despite the fact that men had all the roles of any kind for over 400 years.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat hasn’t had a woman writer for doctor who since Russell T. Davies

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat won an award from an entertainment industry that is to its bones highly racist, sexist, homophobic, amongst a host of other things, including being extremely resistant to change, and as a result, Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat is rewarded for being less than mediocre, incomprehensible, and offensive as fuck.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat encourages and participates in rape culture by blaming women when men ogle them and making light of sexual assault. 

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat uses every Orientalist trope under the sun and constantly dehumanises, shames and dismisses women of colour. 

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat cannot keep his continuity straight to save his fucking life. 

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat thinks “no homo” jokes are viable moments of humor and not actively insulting to actual members of the MOGAI community.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat won an award for writing the same night “The Big Bang Theory” won an award for comedy, which goes to show the merits of the actual award.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat literally cannot even keep the rules of his own monsters consistent within his episodes.

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat has had 0 companions who are people of color during his tenure on Doctor Who, and when writing Davies era episodes wrote Martha and Mickey out of the action so he would have to feature them as little as possible. 

Emmy-award winning writer Steven Moffat had a queer woman kissed against her will by the Doctor before she got to have a kiss with her wife. To date their only kiss has been a “transfer of oxygen.” 

Emmy-award winning writer Steve Moffat has a lesbian character fall in love with a man on Sherlock and had Oswin describe dating a woman as a “phase” on Doctor Who, showing consistent lesbophobia and biphobia in his writing.

I have no idea if the OP intended to prove the point of how shitty Moffat is through juxtaposition by reminding everyone that his shittyness is awarded, but yeah, they proved that point quite good.